1. Is the title descriptive of the abstract? Does the title avoid gratuitous statements
and irrelevant information?
2. Studies barely under way or in which the outcome may be inconclusive should not
be submitted.
3. Scientific abstracts will be evaluated without the knowledge of the name or affiliation
of the author. Thus, identifying phrases within the title and abstract itself are
not allowed and will result in automatic disqualification of the abstract without
evaluation.
4. Does the abstract contain a concise statement which can be evaluated by an impartial
observer, covering the following:
Why did you do the study?
What did you do?
What did you find?
What does it mean?
5.Abstracts with statements such as, will be done, is underway, will be analysed
will be discussed or No data / Insufficient data – to prove the results, wrong methodology
and data acquisition, period of study not given, not enough subjects to draw the
conclusion cannot be accepted.
6 Proof read your abstract? Conciseness, clarity, and care in the preparation of
your abstract are important considerations in the Scientific Committee’s deliberations.
Misspellings and typographical errors do a disservice to your scientific work. If
accepted, your abstract will appear exactly as typed.
7. Is your abstract within the character limit?
Before you Submit any Abstract for FP / Video / Physical Poster :
• Be Sure that you and all your Co Authors are members of OSOS
• Changing the Authorship is not permitted.
• Be Sure that at least the Presenting Author will be attending the Conference-
since changing the Authorship / Non Attendance by the Presenting Author jeopardises
the entire session / Program , Deprive others from presentation,)